31 May
2002
31 May
'02
5:08 p.m.
Use the following syntax: form['aForm.aField:record'] hth, -Casey On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 12:20, p.t. wrote:
Hi, I've a form-field set that would be convinient to name as a record, something like:
<input type="text" name="aForm.aField:record" value="aValue">
Having the necessity to reference some of these fields using java script, it appears that the fieldname violates the js namimg conventions. I know that I can change name like aForm_aField, but this forces me to extract the dictionary parsing the REQUEST.form. Does somebody know if there is a way to work around the js problem using the :record naming convention? TIA, p.t.