23 Jul
2004
23 Jul
'04
9:07 p.m.
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:59:00 -0400, Passin, Tom <tpassin@mitretek.org> wrote:
Note that this use of the term "CDATA" is specific to SGML (as opposed to XML) and has nothing to do with CDATA sections. I know this is confusing - see Joe English's page for some explanation -
What do you know, that's just the link I posted in another conversation about this not long ago! It didn't help that I was calling this a CDATA marked section; the real issue is CDATA declared content, as you point out. There is no equivalent in XML. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>