23 Mar
2007
23 Mar
'07
3:52 p.m.
(Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:03:55AM +0100) Jens Vagelpohl wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
This issue appears when product authors naively use the database modification time instead of defining their own field in which to store modification time data. They would have full control if they used their own time stamps. Most product authors simply don't know what the possible consequences are, or when/how the database modification timestamps are changing.
Zwiki of course uses its own timestamp attribute: last_edit_time The original poster likely got in this mess by not using the Zwiki methods to mass-revert the stuff. Regards, Sascha