29 Jan
2003
29 Jan
'03
5:54 a.m.
--On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 13:44 +0900 Wankyu Choi <wankyu@neoqst.com> wrote:
3. I'm looking towards the Directory Storage over File Storate for tons of reasons, the reasons you might easily guess. I'll have six 73G disks with RAID5, which means I'd have to let go 73G for storing parity information. That leaves me about 365G. At least 300G will be allocated for ZODB. Would FileStorage maintain its integrity if the db grows to 300G? What I'm worried about most is that I can't make it versionless. Directory Storage has that option. Comments?
With 300GB you are at the point where I would think about a RDBMS as backend. I assume maintaining or packing a 300GB Data.fs might be a pain (20-30GB are already hard to handle). -aj