From: Bill Anderson <bill@libc.org>
I am sure you did no tintend to slant the state of affairs by intentionally not mentioning the problems/bugs with IE, but just teh same, it is "fair" to include them as well.
It is also fair to all of the browsers that some of the alleged bugs with them are not bugs, but simply differences in handling unclear, or vague parts of the various specifications.
Just because browser X does it differently than browser Y, does not make it a bug.
True. But if you read the HTML4 spec, XHTML, etc. and code a page following that, and see what you get, what happens. Are the W3C specs valid or not? My limited experience shows me that the IE browsers do a better job of rendering a moderately complicated page (like the CMF default template).
Again, I have not made argument with CSS support, merely noted that CSS is not HTML. it is, indeed, a separate sepcification and standard.
But it is part of the HTML4 standard that CSS has to be supported, and all the standards after (e.g. XHTML), right?