One reason to run ZEO is to spread the load over several ZEO clients. Using ZEO on the machine does not make sense in this case. It might make sense for dual processor machines to utilize both CPUs. Using ZEO on a single-CPU machine makes sense for debugging and development but not very much for production. -aj --On Sonntag, 19. Oktober 2003 8:51 Uhr -0400 Paul Howell <paul@smoothstone.com> wrote:
Back in August, runyaga wrote:
you should never go into production without ZEO. you should never add live components / migrate a plone server / pack ZODB on a server that serves requests. ~runyaga
Does this ZEO suggestion even apply on single server zope machines? Is this standard operating procedure? Is it written up anywhere as such? I have run naked Zope on some boxes for years without problems, and Zope behind Apache. But I'm currently setting up some new boxen and would like to know the rationale for using ZEO on them.
Do you run ZEO on standalone boxes? What are the advantages? What are the disadvantages? Does it make a difference with dual processor servers?
Thanks, =Paul
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )