At 12:22 pm +0200 30/3/00, Jochen Haeberle wrote:
At 19:06 Uhr -0500 29.03.2000, Luke Tymowski wrote:
If you want a fast, cheap, Zope box look at the G3-450s. Even an iMac. Or a Celeron. But not the Cobalt lineup.
Really? What would you put on the Macs? Linux, OS X or MacOS?
Now - LinuxPPC (my Mac at home that gets 900 pystones is usable for me to do dev work on). Later - choose from OS-X or LinuxPPC You can't (easily) use MacOS because Zope has some unix-centric parts that don't translate well to the Mac.
What makes the Celeron superior to the Cobalt-setup in your opinion?
The Pystone scores are higher Celeron-400a Pystone(1.1) time for 10000 passes = 1.78 This machine benchmarks at 5588.87 pystones/second vs Qube2 Pystone(1.1) time for 10000 passes = 8.81 This machine benchmarks at 1135.07 pystones/second
I thought the Cobalts where rahter high-speed (full) pentiums and that the Celeron is not well suited for server use??
Sorry, not qualified to answer that bit. All I do know is that we have a 700MHz PIII here that gets 10,500 Pystones against our Enterprise 450 with ... 2700. As the maintenance on the Sun kit is roughly the same price as the PIII, you could say I'm not overly impressed with the Sun... Tone ------ Dr Tony McDonald, FMCC, Networked Learning Environments Project http://nle.ncl.ac.uk/ The Medical School, Newcastle University Tel: +44 191 222 5888 Fingerprint: 3450 876D FA41 B926 D3DD F8C3 F2D0 C3B9 8B38 18A2