Michel Pelletier <michel@digicool.com> writes:
We had this debate about ten years ago (internet time). The result of that debate is obvious. Let's let dead dogs lie.
Hi Michel, oops - wasn't aware this was a dog. (I might have forgotten). Naturally until I see a good counter-argument from someone I'll continue to think the current setup is broken.* It looks as if you want to squelch this thread, but it would have been nice to discuss this a little longer. We might have found out more about what the current consensus is (we had 2 for & 2 against); why people find it useful; who's decision it is one way or another; etc.
From time to time I see discussions around here which seem well within bounds of reasonable tone and topic, and which interest at least some of the list membership, which "DC" seems to feel it must stamp on.
So I'll take the opportunity to ask: does DC officially frown on eg threads like this one ? -Simon * a technical term. "Not as good as it could and should be IMHO".