+-------[ Chris Withers ]---------------------- | Andrew Milton wrote: | >| Indeed, but "classic" doesn't have any "bad" connotations as far as I'm | >| concerned, and it'll need to keep living as long as Plone relies on it, | >| which will be forever... | > | >Plenty of people use it without plone. You might want to crawl out of | >the vacuum you live in. | | Yes, and I'm one of them, but I don't think it's fair to try and tempt | new users into it... | | I'm happy to be proven wrong by you writing lots of decent docs, picking | up maintenance of zope.org and LocalFS ;-) You're good at volunteering people to do work. I already maintain a lot of code, and I have my own LocalFS-type code so I don't see the need to maintain a different one. If I was using it, I would happily take it over, in the same way I've given my code over to other people to maintain. As for docs, an army of people continually volunteer on #zope to update the zope book. Given my other contributions to Zope society, there are people far better suited to writing technical documentation than I. I'm happy to be a knowledge resource for anyone wanting to update the existing book / write a new freely available document. -- Andrew Milton akm@theinternet.com.au