Alan Milligan wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Comments are welcome. :)
If the work indicated in the security audit does not require additional effort for 2.9,
Effort will be needed.
then it would be best to get it into 2.8 ASAP, allowing 2.8 to be run under 2.3 or 2.4 as an 'approved' transitional environment.
That is out of scope for the proposal. ...
Until then, in the interests of not alienating a large user base, a 2.8.x release approved for 2.4 would be most appreciated.
This would require a new 2.8 release and would require a volunteer to make the necessary security changes. If Andreas wants to make another release and there is a volunteer to do the security changes, then it's OK with me, although I'm not sure it's worth the bother. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim@zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org