22 Feb
2003
22 Feb
'03
11:02 a.m.
Terry Hancock wrote:
ZPT's actual program structure is buried in attributes where it is nearly invisible, and certainly incomprehensible to the designer. It also contains a lot of annoying and distracting boilerplate. Nearly every ZPT example on the "DTML to ZPT" page is *longer* and *harder to understand* than the original DTML. This should be telling you something!
In real life examples they are often shorter, and almost allways easier to read. How come that people who only uses dtml, believes that dtml is best, while people using both dtml and zpt finds that zpt is the better choice? Hmmm ... it's enough to make a man wonder ;-) regards Max M, who uses both ...