18 Apr
2001
18 Apr
'01
10:36 p.m.
Chris Withers wrote:
Sorry, but this seems kindof silly... what's the point of doing a final beta if you're not going to make any changes (even fixing bugs!) after it?
Surely you might as well just release it as the final then?
cheers,
The way I understand it is that if more important bugs are found in a beta, then another beta is issued. After a suitable period has passed without substancial bugs reported, the final beta becomes the release version. This is so that *any* fixes are checked in beta first, not just released on assumption that nothing was broke. -- | Casey Duncan | Kaivo, Inc. | cduncan@kaivo.com `------------------>