On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:07:49PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but mod_proxy does open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same connection for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing load, this can become a Problem.
Well, it's not "a way to do it", it's *the* way.
Thats a real good argument. There is no *the* way. Every situation is different and having as mutch possibilities as possible is allways the best way to do it.
It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great thing to keep, volunteer.
I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem with the Code right now. As I said i runs here perfectly smooth. Bye Estartu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | Fischbachweg 3 | | PGP Public Key 86856 Hiltenfingen | EMail: estartu@augusta.de | on request Germany | |