12 Sep
2002
12 Sep
'02
12:17 p.m.
On Thursday 12 Sep 2002 12:56 pm, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
zope is not lightweight like you average apache process. it likes RAM. and it will take more and more as the content on your sites grow since the ZODB index is stored in RAM.
If you use FileStorage, yes. FileStorage would be a bad choice for this project. All berkeley-based storage and DirectoryStorage do not have this problem. Also the new ZODB memory cache in Zope 2.6 is less wasteful with ram than previous versions. If Andreas is running zope in 11-18 MB of RAM I guess he is already using this. If not, there is an extra saving to be made.