Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe an access rule is even necessary with Enhanced VirtualHostMonster (http://www.zope.org/Members/sfm/SiteAccessEnhanced). You just drop it in, set your domain/subfolder mappings, and you're good to go.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:35:54PM +0100, Ivo van der Wijk wrote:
Is it possible to imitate the behaviour of a SiteRoot object in an access_rule?
The basic idea is like this: Alot of virtual hosts point to our Zope server, and an access_rule in the / of the Zope server dispatches request to the appropriate subfolder.
This works perfectly, except that base href in generated documents is wrong, it includes the entire path, while I would like it to skip the part up to the actual root of the site.
This can be solved by installing a default SiteRoot in the subfolders, but I would rather not depend on all these SiteRoots (which people will modify, delete, etc, also the make managing these folders difficult)
Is it possible to adjust the SiteRoot/SiteBASE/?? directly in my accessrule?
I have built virtual domains with only an access_rule and a VirtualHostMonster. Isa simple. I just manipulate the taversal stack based on the HTTP_HOST var and voila, instant virtual hosts. You can make this pretty generic and not need a SiteRoot object at all.
-- Martijn Pieters | Software Engineer mailto:mj@zope.com | Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com/ | Creators of Zope http://www.zope.org/ ---------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )