18 Feb
2005
18 Feb
'05
7:58 p.m.
That's perfectly ok. Non-persistent attributes get stored and retrieved as part of their persistent container. Otherwise there would be no way to use simple type attributes like strings and integers... Stefan On 18. Feb 2005, at 10:36, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
I'm little surprised by the possibility to insert non-persistent instances inside persistent object.
-- Software Engineering is Programming when you can't. --E. W. Dykstra