8 Feb
2001
8 Feb
'01
3:21 p.m.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:31:17 +0300 (MSK), Oleg Broytmann <phd@phd.pp.ru> wrote: I think its fair to say that the beta cycle for 2.3.0 was suprisingly short.
It was declared "stable" exactly because no one caugth such behaviour. In the world of free software it is *you* who test software, send patches to authors, etc.
Even those keeping up with CVS might not have had time to test 2.3.0 between the last feature going in, and it being declared stable. I know I didnt! Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com