John Ziniti wrote:
The problem I have with my "solution" is that I have no clue what _p_jar is.
It's all to do with ZODB persistence. I'm not sure why the wrapper was ever given a _p_jar, it's probably not a good idea, but then LocalFS is very old but was very good at the time, so there's likely to be a good reason for it to be there :-S I dunno, try contact Jonathan Farr, the product's author and see if he can remember. Other than that, maybe ask on zodb-dev@zope.org about any problems you may experience from removing it :-S My wories aren't so much about persistence, but whether these wrappers will play nicely with the transation framework without a _p_jar. They should, but I wouldn't want to bet on it... good luck! Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk