On 6/24/06, Andrew Sawyers <andrew@sawdog.com> wrote:
There would be VERY limited things an individual could upload. I personally argued strongly for 0 membership on this site. If the ideas of micro sites went forward, the appropriate micro sites could allow (or not) membership as necessary. [...]
Who will decides which content is worth migration? For the site I refer to, only that which meets the scope of the site.
-MAXINT from me. You are trying to make a top run "managed" site. I think that is wrong for a collaborative software project by principle, and it also means that ZF will have to pay sometbdy to create content on the site, which to me seems to be a complete waste of money, when reasonably the community members should do that themselves. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/