To make it short: - use Apache+Zope if you have a smaller website and you don't like to hurt your brain about the 1000 configuration options of Squid. - use Squid-Zope if you have a high volume website and have some experiences with Squid. Apache offers less related configuration options than you have fingers at your hand. Squid has more than a hundred. -> Apache+Zope=easy to use, easy to setup -> Squid+Zope=requires more work and you should know what you're doing. -aj --On Dienstag, 5. November 2002 01:24 -0500 Ausum Studio <ausum_studio@hotmail.com> wrote:
I know this has been treated before, but as much as I can see, people use the three ways with apparent success. Within the context that ZC is funding Squid to implement ESI, would any member of the community try a theoretical resume (not a how-to) of the issues regarding using Squid to cache Zope? Which one of the three combinations is the best?
Ausum
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jo Meder" <jo@meder.de>
(...) We're using Apache in front of Squid in front of Zope to implement virtual hosts and caching wherever possible btw.
Jo.
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
--------------------------------------------------------------------- - Andreas Jung http://www.andreas-jung.com - - EMail: andreas at andreas-jung.com - - "Life is too short to (re)write parsers" - ---------------------------------------------------------------------