14 Sep
1999
14 Sep
'99
2:52 p.m.
Alexander Staubo wrote In my opinion it's getting increasingly obvious that the ZODB badly needs cheap, non-undoable, "transient" transactions.
<aol>me too</aol>
Counters, sessions, often-refreshed internal state tables -- lots of applications need it, and moving this stuff outside the ZODB breaks with the object-oriented design.
an alternative would be an object that's backed by an SQL table. change the attributes, it flows through to the table. Anthony.