On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Adam Blomberg wrote:
case when absolute_url is used, ExtFile.py:649.) I have tested most cases I can think of using the default configuration, and everything seems to work fine (both via the ZMI and via FTP). I haven't tested the new functionality offered in this version however. This sounds promissing.
The only thing that I see as a possible issue when upgrading from a previous version of ExtFile is the new default location of the repository (static/reposit/ instead of var/reposit/). While the new behaviour is clearly stated on the download page and easily changed in Config.py, perhaps it could be set to the old default when upgrading ExtFile. Thanks for the hint. This is a clear issue which has to be adressed for upgrading. A quick thight brings a symlink into mind or alternatively copy old data to the new location in a postinst script. But I would like to hear the rationale behind this move.
Kind regards Andreas.