Michael:
Jason Spisak wrote:
Pavlos:
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Lalo Martins wrote:
Regarding archiving and distributing Data.fs files very efficient algorithms specific to Data.fs can be written.
This is what I'm talking about. Splitting the Data.fs into pieces and maybe even each object has it's own piece with revisions of that object stored in it's piece. This offers some interesting pluses. Anyone see anything really glaringly wrong with this?
Well, what about 'move' transactions (cut-and-paste)?
How does the ZODB handle them now? Are the locations of objects dependent on their location in the ZODB file? If not, then there is no difference. I'm not sure how relationship data (container, etc...) is stored in the ZODB. Is it stored with the object? Anyone? All my best, Jason Spisak CIO HireTechs.com 6151 West Century Boulevard Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90045 P. 310.665.3444 F. 310.665.3544 Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for repeats.