Hi, In article <A0CB750E1402D511A47600A0C9E110D101CD1FAF@IWA-MERCURY>, Scott Meilicke wrote:
I look at my server logs over the past year and when a browser hits 2-3% or lower, stop worrying about back supporting its bugs and inconsistencies.
What about browsers used by e.g. blind people who may use Lynx and the like to drive text-to-speech systems? I'm not "having a go" - I wanted to raise the subject for the benefit of anybody to whom it had not occurred, and I wanted to understand if you were saying that you wouldn't pander to obsolete browsers which are not standards compliant (I wouldn't), or if you were rejecting the principle that web sites should "degrade gracefully" for those with less spiffy user agents... On this topic, folks might find the following link interesting: - http://www.digital-web.com/features/feature_2002-09.shtml Regards, PhilK Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:12 +0100 @ Ganesh EMail: phil@xfr.co.uk / Phone, Voicemail & Facsimile: 07902 070518 Tell me and I forget. Show me and I remember. Involve me and I understand. - Chinese saying