14 Aug
2000
14 Aug
'00
1:21 p.m.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:30:43 +0200, "Philipp Auersperg" <zope@philosoft.at> wrote:
We want to (mis)use zope as an application server servicing a proprietary non-http protocol for transmitting compressed data.
Its easy to overlook http if your application is not a conventional 'web' application, but there are strong reasons for sticking with http if possible: you can benefit from the existing tools and infrastructure, plus Zope already talks http. SOAP looks like it will be popular for similar reasons. What do you need to do that makes http unsuitable? Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com