At 01:02 14/07/99 , Alexander Staubo wrote:
Of course. Call it a momentarily lapse of reason -- I wasn't thinking clearly. Honestly! :-)
I remember being somewhat annoyed by this at one point as I could not find a way to cleanly handle class construction -- I ended up putting a check in the class' index_html and creating my instances there, which is an ugly but functional hack. I still think ZClasses should be permitted to expose constructor-like methods. The form-handling code you described works but is hardly a "neat" solution.
You could define a 'Contructor' method on your ZClass, and have the form-handling code call it. Should be a good workaround for the time being, and easily converted to whatever standard there ever might be.. -- Martijn Pieters, Web Developer | Antraciet http://www.antraciet.nl | Tel: +31-35-7502100 Fax: +31-35-7502111 | mailto:mj@antraciet.nl http://www.antraciet.nl/~mj | PGP: http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8A32149 ------------------------------------------