10 Dec
2005
10 Dec
'05
9:13 a.m.
Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2005, 09:39 +0000 schrieb Chris Withers:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:
It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.
Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.
Show me some evidence proving that fcgi or mod_proxy is the significant limiting performance factor in a setup involving zope and I'll take this seriously ;-)
The funny thing is - performance isnt really the pro of fcgi over http. Its really more about transporting header and environment data from zope to apache, which is kinda limited with mod_proxy. (Think alternative authentication, ssl ) Tino.