Maybe you could map it to libferris instead of the file system and then we could many types of different data storage. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9373 On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> wrote:
Garito wrote at 2008-2-29 00:35 +0100:
I can understand Yuri Zope uses the tree to run and the filesystem is a tree
When I'm developing Yanged (my Zope project) I think about that. I would like to create a version of Zope with the most essential parts: the traverse way the adquisition in an apache module (and apache of course) the filesystem as object data base and Zope Smart Manager as ZMI
It would not be that difficult:
Your Apache module would call "ZPublisher.Publish.publish" with a module name different from "Zope2".
Your "Zope2" replacement would provide the objects required by "ZPublisher.Publish.get_module_info". It could e.g. use a LocalFS instance as "bobo_application" and immediately, your objects would come from the filesystem (as mapped by "LocalFS").
-- Dieter
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )