Hi fritz, --On Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 15:32 +0800 Fritz Mesedilla <fritz.mesedilla@summitmedia.com.ph> wrote:
well, the reason i wanted to use index.html is for log files to process it properly.
This is even not neccesary for "ordinary" (file based) web servers. One would link to the folders and use the folder names. web-analyzing software has aliases for this. (I dont really see why one would use ugly urls with something like "index.html" in it) Regards Tino :-)
but thanks to web*r (i'm not advertising cause i don't even know them) i was able to produce the webstats we needed though i had a lot of trial and error going. zope produces images as *folders* in log files that it includes that in the stats. but i was able to find a way to omit this.
thanks all.
Fritz Mesedilla Systems Administrator
Summit Interactive, Inc. FHM | Seventeen | Candy | Cosmopolitan | Preview | Good Housekeeping femalenetwork.com | candymag.com | fhm.com.ph | cosmo.com.ph ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- http://contemplation401.tripod.com +Basta Ikaw Lord
-----Original Message----- From: Philippe Jadin [mailto:philippe.jadin@123piano.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:28 AM To: fritz.mesedilla@summitmedia.com.ph Subject: Re: [Zope] index.html problem
how come when we changed our filenames from index_html to index.html things started to get messy?
some pages appear properly but some retrieve pages from other directories.
is there a *rule* that we can't change this?
A simple solution would be to place an index.html file in the root simply containing <dtml-var index_html> in it. Then keep your index_html files, and link to the index.html file. But then comes the question : why use index.html files?
Should work...
Philippe
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )