6 Dec
2005
6 Dec
'05
7:34 p.m.
Chris Withers wrote at 2005-12-5 07:51 +0000:
Andrew Milton wrote:
If there's noone around who can maintain it, then just say that. Don't say there's 'a better way', because I can guarantee you the people using FCGI are using it for a reason,
I haven't seen anyone come up with real justification for using FCGI...
The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI: It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection. Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient. -- Dieter