Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Bill Anderson wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Just packaged up.
And there was almost much rejoicing. It doesn't seme to want to mount the root of a Data.fs, at least according to the add form. Is this by design? Were there problems with mounting the root of a Data.fs, or is it just a limitation of the add form?
It is by design. If you were to mount the root of a Data.fs, you'd be mounting an Application object with no ID. This would play havoc with the pseudo-filesystem.
The correct solution is to make it so folder objects do not contain their own ID (but rather determined by the parent folder) and make Application objects go away, replacing them with simple Folder objects.
Shane
So, what would you suggest for the following scenario? o Site distirbuted via ZEO o Using SiteAccess2 for virtual hosting sites under /vhosts/thissite /vhosts/thatsite o each site is actually it's own full Data.fs Under non-zeo, it's simple, use a mounted filestorage, and it works quite well. Unfortunately, it doesn't work under zeo, for obvious reasons. If I had time, I'd do a mountedZEOstorage, but time is too much a precious commodity for the next few weeks/months. :/ Bill