On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 05:10 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jean Baltus wrote at 2003-9-25 16:22 +0200:
I don't have time to put on my swimsuit and dive into the ZODB today but I will...
In the meantime, here is the exact copy of my access rule (in case you notice something weird):
session = context.REQUEST.SESSION path_info = context.REQUEST['PATH_INFO']
if not session.has_key('skin'): session.set('skin', 'bidon')
if path_info.find("/muse") >=0: session.set('skin', 'muse') elif path_info.find("/res") >=0: session.set('skin', 'res')
if session['skin']== 'res': context.changeSkin('res')
Thus, you read and write "session". Almost surely, this is the cause of your "ConflictError"s.
Yup. Jean, try to avoid needless writes to the session object. For example throw some conditional code in your access rule of the form: if session.get(key) != value: session.set(key,value) That should help reduce the number of "ConflictError"s. Michael