On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:02:26 -0500 "Kevin Dangoor" <kid@kendermedia.com> wrote: [...]
In the short term I don't foresee a lot of traffic on my site, and I hope that in the long term the problem with ZODB will be fixed.
DC knows about this, but I'm not sure if there is a reasonable core-level solution to it. The problem can be dealt with at the application level.
OK. [...]
Also, DC plans to make it possible to use multiple storages for one logical object database. There are some heavy duty issues they need to work out before that is possible though. Once it happens, you could use the FileSystem storage for your relatively static content and BerkeleyStorage or SQLStorage for frequently changing content. There are limitless possibilities for dealing with these issues where the application demands it.
This would be very cool :-) +++ I'm still not sure if I will go on with Zope for this project (my boss is pushing me to meet the deadline, no matter the tool I use) but I will for sure keep an eye on its development. Thank you all for the replies, bye -- Diego | To reply remove the `x' and swap the | Sorry for my Dainese | words around the `@' in the address. | bad English.