"Ronald L. Chicheter" wrote:
Does anyone know why you MUST include a non-null date in a date field of a ZClass?
How about because taht's the way it works <vbg> Guess you really didn't need that did you Ron? Anyway, the work around that I use is to just include a default that I know is either far into the past or far into the future so it can be excluded easily. Then any time you instantiate that class you also have to include a default for any dates that you do not yet want to fill. I usually just use a hidden field in the form. IIRC, the my_date_property:ignore_empty doesn't work either. All in all, it's still better than using a string property and doing the conversions. -- Tim Cook, President - FreePM,Inc. http://www.FreePM.com Office: (731) 884-4126 ONLINE DEMO: http://www.freepm.org:8080/FreePM