I have been testing and asking about this for a month now and here is what I found. I have a Pentium 133 with 96 MB running RH 6.0, Apache, Zope and whole bunch of Java development applications (it is loaded). It has about 10 development servers on it only one of which is Zope. I have a home page which is the same one as one on a NT 4.0, SQL 6.5 box (not sure about specs but am sure it is high end). I have run queries through 95,000 records, reloaded the home page hundreds of times and run smaller queries over and over again. What I found is that the NT box is only faster when it comes to the big 95K select. I can load the Zope homepage about five times to every once on the NT. The small queries are just as fast. I am moving to a production box for Zope that will be a 300 PII, 256 RAM, 6 GB drive running just Apache (I am thinking proxy pass) and Zope with PostGreSQL. I will be testing all aspects of site when I get it up and running by this weekend and will report back. I guess the answer is, if you have a spare workstation sitting around, you can run Zope on RH but don't even think about throwing SQL 7 and NT on it. More to come, suggestions welcome. JMA
From: Guy Davis <davis@arc.ab.ca> Organization: Alberta Research Council Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:22:18 -0700 To: zope@zope.org Subject: [Zope] Zope Server Performance and Scalability
I set up a Zope 2.12 server on a PentiumPro 200 with 64MB running RH6.1 Linux. Currently I am using Apache with pcgi to handle the initial requests and MySQL for Zope's database for bug tracking and other apps.
I have been asked to defend my choice of Linux over WinNT. This server will be used by approximately 50 people who will mostly make use of the document management abilities of Zope and run occasional database queries.
If we assume heavy use from all 50 people, can Zope handle the loads easily? What kind of numbers (hits/second, etc.) can others report to help me back up my claim that it can? I understand that Zope is significantly slower than MS SiteServer, but for our needs is it not more than sufficient?
My next question is the same but for up to 500 users. There is a small possibility that Zope may be used corporate wide rather than just for our local business units. This would likely require more serious hardware? What level? At what point does it become necessary to move to the Zope Enterprise Option?
Also, what has been your experience with Zope's reliability on Linux? Has anyone been in a backup recovery situation? Was it difficult getting Zope working again from a nightly archive?
This is a lot of questions but I really appreciate anyone who takes the time to answer them. -- Guy Davis mailto:davis@arc.ab.ca (403) 210-5334 Alberta Research Council
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )