On Thursday 12 September 2002 01:23, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
so you really think that coming up with a setup like you propose is better than getting some extra RAM? i don't get it. RAM is comparably cheap.
that's true. It would be my solution of choice if I had physical access to my server. well maybe I've got to think about a more expensive machine.
besides, 11-18 MB of RAM consumption for a zope process really isn't much at all.
that depends on the view. after 20 instances between 220 and 360 MB are eaten. a bad thing if your server has only 256 MB. Furthermore this makes disk access slower as the "zope overhead" throws out disk cache pages. Regards AND -- "I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this." -- Emo Phillips