Re: [Zope] Performance of webserver?
What about compared to Apache with the Python plugin? (I'm pretty sure there is such a thing, I just can't find the name of it right now....). Obviously that ignore the complexity of your vanilla-Python app, but it's not unreasonable to recognize that a typical website will have a mix of - static pages - pages with some relatively simple SSI logic - some pages which could be generated by medium-complexity Python code - and maybe some stuff that really takes advantage of Zope. Getting a sense of the rough performance comparisons in each case would be very helpful. (And if there's a better configuration for certain cases, like use Medusa instead of Apache, that would get bonus points.) "Christopher Petrilli" <petrilli@digicool.com> on 08/31/99 09:52:18 AM To: Suder Steen SFS <sfs@sciatl.dk>, zope@zope.org cc: (bcc: Bill Seitz/Medscape) Subject: Re: [Zope] Performance of webserver?
Hi,
One of the last questions for now, I'd like to know the answer for is:
What is the performance of the webserver in Zope 2? I'd like to compare to Apache on Linux (our Zope will be running on one of these).
Some nebulous number that I can invent for your statistical pleasure. Quite honestly you've asked a question which has no answer. Zope2 is slower. But not if you compare CGI v. Zope. Zope2 is a 100% dynamic page generation situation, whereas Apache is only serving static pages. So if you're site is 100% static, use Apache, but as it gets more dynamic, I think you'll find Zope2 to be faster and faster. Performance on a "mid size" Linux box would be 35-50 hits/second (which translates to 3.8M hits/day).
Can the webserver be used in productionenvironment? How much load can it take compared to Apache before I need to upgrade hw? The same? Half? Double?
Do you understand the unanswerable nature of your question? The only benchmark that matters is your own application. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli Python Powered Digital Creations, Inc. | petrilli@digicool.com http://www.digicool.com _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope (To receive general Zope announcements, see: http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce For developer-specific issues, zope-dev@zope.org - http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Bill Seitz wrote:
What about compared to Apache with the Python plugin? (I'm pretty sure
there is
such a thing, I just can't find the name of it right now....).
Yeah, there is an apache module (mod_python I believe). It was available from modules.apache.org the last time I looked.
Getting a sense of the rough performance comparisons in each case would be
very
helpful. (And if there's a better configuration for certain cases, like use Medusa instead of Apache, that would get bonus points.)
On a similar note, does anyone know what the perfomance difference is between standard pcgi and mod_pcgi? Does mod-pcgi even work? I haven't seen much mention of it. Also, is it possible for ZServer to publish from the filesystem as opposed to the ODB/ For istance could http://myserver/somefiles be dynamic zope, while http://myserver/someotherfiles could be static pages served up directly without the need for Apache, or is this impossible with the current implementation of ZServer? Thanks, Jason
participants (2)
-
Bill_Seitz@mail.medscape.com -
Jason Jones