Hello, Is a good idea split Data.fs? (comments) Is there any way to divide or split the Data.fs into some parts? Thanks. Marcus Mendes
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Marcus Mendes wrote:
Is a good idea split Data.fs? (comments)
I'm sure it depends on your system design and constraints. In a "normal" situation (whatever that is <grin>) it probably doesn't matter much. Some cases where you'd consider it: getting around the Linux 2GB limit, putting frequently changed objects in a non-undo storage, putting an area of the site with special characteristics (eg: the zope.org wiki area) in its own storage.
Is there any way to divide or split the Data.fs into some parts?
Yes, mountable storages. --RDM
"R. David Murray" wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Marcus Mendes wrote:
Is a good idea split Data.fs? (comments)
I'm sure it depends on your system design and constraints. In a "normal" situation (whatever that is <grin>) it probably doesn't matter much. Some cases where you'd consider it: getting around the Linux 2GB limit, putting frequently changed objects in a non-undo storage, putting an area of the site with special characteristics (eg: the zope.org wiki area) in its own storage.
Is there any way to divide or split the Data.fs into some parts?
Yes, mountable storages.
a caveat emptor, last time i checked, zclasses have problems with mountable dbs. if they're defined in one zodb storage you can't instantiate them in another.
participants (3)
-
Kapil Thangavelu -
Marcus Mendes -
R. David Murray