RE: [Zope] Re: pulling from another website
[martin f krafft]
also sprach Mike Renfro <renfro@tntech.edu> [2003.03.17.1855 +0100]:
http://www.zope.org/Members/ajung/HTTPMounter might do it, if a LocalFS-type solution is what you need.
unfortunately, this won't cut it. i don't want to serve a remote file, i want to include the remote contents in a file that i serve locally. sorry for not having been quite clear.
Simplest is to put it into a frame or IFrame, by means of a bit of javascript called by an onLoad event. Cheers, Tom P
also sprach Passin, Tom <tpassin@mitretek.org> [2003.03.17.2002 +0100]:
Simplest is to put it into a frame or IFrame, by means of a bit of javascript called by an onLoad event.
javascript is evil. moreover, this won't work if someone browses the site with e.g. lynx. i don't believe in anything-client-side. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck keyserver problems? http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/keyserver.html get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc "there are two major products that come out of berkeley: lsd and unix." one caused me an addiction -- fyodor
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:38:40 +0100 GMT (..20:38 where i live(GMT+1) ) martin f krafft asked the Zope mailinglist about the following: mfk> also sprach Passin, Tom <tpassin@mitretek.org> [2003.03.17.2002 +0100]:
Simplest is to put it into a frame or IFrame, by means of a bit of javascript called by an onLoad event.
- there is no need to use javascript in this case, Iframes work perfectly fine without... mfk> javascript is evil. moreover, this won't work if someone browses the mfk> site with e.g. lynx. Javascript is perfectly fine if you only use it to add onto what is usable without, and make sure you clean after yourself ;) Just use the right tools for the right job... mfk> i don't believe in anything-client-side. lilke HTML ? -- Geir Bækholt
also sprach Geir Bækholt <lists@elvix.com> [2003.03.17.2050 +0100]:
- there is no need to use javascript in this case, Iframes work perfectly fine without...
how supported are iframes? from all i know about them is that most every security-conscious browser has them disabled, thanks to the clowns in redmond.
Javascript is perfectly fine if you only use it to add onto what is usable without, and make sure you clean after yourself ;)
exactly.
mfk> i don't believe in anything-client-side. lilke HTML ?
no, see above. HTML is made to be formatted on the client side, especially with CSS coming in. i don't care *how* a user sees my site(s) as long as the information is there. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck keyserver problems? http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/keyserver.html get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc if billy gates had a penny for every time, a windoze box crashed... oh, wait a minute -- he already does.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:54:33 +0100 GMT (..20:54 where i live(GMT+1) ) martin f krafft asked the Zope mailinglist about the following: mfk> how supported are iframes? from all i know about them is that most mfk> every security-conscious browser has them disabled, thanks to the mfk> clowns in redmond. don't work in that horrid NN4-thing, but almost everything after that should be ok. The problem from Redmond isn't with the iframes itself, but with the silly concept of launching local applications within them... There is a common misconception that they are some ugly MS-hack, but they are in the W3 specs for HTML4.0 at least. There might be the same security restrictions as on normal frames when framing other hosts/domeins, though.. - settable locally -- Geir Bækholt
participants (3)
-
Geir Bækholt -
martin f krafft -
Passin, Tom