Re: [Zope] Re: ANNOUNCE: BlogDot - a Squishdot mod
At 10:02 27-11-2002 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Mario Valente wrote:
Any testing/suggestions/critiques/bug reports are welcome :-)
Any reason to do this sane enhancement not in upstream SquishDot??
We just didnt want to create a source "fork" in Squishdot. And we dont think that changing Squishdot to do this (although "sane" :) is comfortable for many people used to TABLE etc stuff (ie not used to CSS stuff). C U! -- MV
Mario Valente wrote:
At 10:02 27-11-2002 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Mario Valente wrote:
Any testing/suggestions/critiques/bug reports are welcome :-)
Any reason to do this sane enhancement not in upstream SquishDot??
We just didnt want to create a source "fork" in Squishdot. And we dont think that changing Squishdot to do this (although "sane" :) is comfortable for many people used to TABLE etc stuff (ie not used to CSS stuff).
Yes, but it could be added as another option to the 'plain' and 'blue heaven' list of demos... cheers, Chris
At 14:08 27-11-2002 +0000, Chris Withers wrote:
Mario Valente wrote:
At 10:02 27-11-2002 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Mario Valente wrote:
Any testing/suggestions/critiques/bug reports are welcome :-)
Any reason to do this sane enhancement not in upstream SquishDot??
We just didnt want to create a source "fork" in Squishdot. And we dont think that changing Squishdot to do this (although "sane" :) is comfortable for many people used to TABLE etc stuff (ie not used to CSS stuff).
Yes, but it could be added as another option to the 'plain' and 'blue heaven' list of demos...
Hey, you can count on us to help with that :-).... ... and we'll be sure to put a "Using Squishdot" reference in the BlogDot homepage ;-) C U! -- MV
participants (2)
-
Chris Withers -
Mario Valente