Re: [Zope] This is completely bogus but..
Jason Spisak wrote:
What products would it not work for? (So I can not make one ;)
Anything that patches Zope (such as TransparentFolders and SiteAccess) is right out. Any product that has memory leaks will probably not be able to be reloaded correctly. New DTML tags might not take either. But products that basically just subclass Folder or SimpleItem have a good chance of reloading without major problems.
Would a product that implements an imperfect "reload" function interest the Zope community? SPEAK UP!
Absolutely!
I think it could be a new tab on each product folder. The trouble is that it may crash Zope if used on the wrong product(s). But if used for development only, it would speed things up a bit. I will ponder more. Shane
Shane Hathaway writes:
Jason Spisak wrote:
What products would it not work for? (So I can not make one ;)
Anything that patches Zope (such as TransparentFolders and SiteAccess) is right out. Any product that has memory leaks will probably not be able to be reloaded correctly. New DTML tags might not take either. But products that basically just subclass Folder or SimpleItem have a good chance of reloading without major problems.
Would a product that implements an imperfect "reload" function interest the Zope community? SPEAK UP!
Absolutely!
I think it could be a new tab on each product folder.
I sent out t mails last week suggesting that it be a tab or method that you could include in your product.
The trouble is that it may crash Zope if used on the wrong product(s).
Then those products don't get the tab? View it as more of a development option for *your* product.
But if used for development only, it would speed things up a bit. I will ponder more.
When you ponder good things happen. All my best, Jason Spisak CIO HireTechs.com 6151 West Century Boulevard Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90045 P. 310.665.3444 F. 310.665.3544 Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for repeats.
participants (2)
-
Jason Spisak -
Shane Hathaway