IMHO, the 1.11pre release is useful because it was available in binary form and ready to run under Windows.
Well, 2.0a is no less or more buggy than 1.11pre, as the main difference is the addition of the ZODB3 software, but you can continue to use your ZODB2 database. I would recommend just moving to that for development---but NOT deployment.
A Windows binary would be very useful. It's no problem to compile something with gcc, but I don't have a windows c compiler. Oliver -- I'm busily ignoring some thousand of implications I have determined to be irrelevant.
On Wed, 26 May 1999, .Oliver_Thuns. wrote:
IMHO, the 1.11pre release is useful because it was available in binary form and ready to run under Windows.
Well, 2.0a is no less or more buggy than 1.11pre, as the main difference is the addition of the ZODB3 software, but you can continue to use your ZODB2 database. I would recommend just moving to that for development---but NOT deployment.
A Windows binary would be very useful. It's no problem to compile something with gcc, but I don't have a windows c compiler.
What about djgpp?
Oliver -- I'm busily ignoring some thousand of implications I have determined to be irrelevant.
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
(For developer-specific issues, use the companion list, zope-dev@zope.org - http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
-- Howard Clinton Shaw III - Grum St. Thomas High School #include "disclaimer.h"
participants (2)
-
.Oliver_Thuns. -
Howard Clinton Shaw III