Hi, I want to generate statistics about the access on a zope server like you do on normal web servers (e.g. apache): 1.) What format has the Zope logfile (Z2.log ? Is it the right file ?) ? 2.) Are there any tools like 'webalizer', 'analog' ,... for zope ? 3.) Can I analyze it with such standard tools ? 4.) Are there any parameters I need ? ciao. Stefan Bambach ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan Bambach triplex - agentur für neue medien GmbH Erhardtstr. 8 80469 München Tel: +49 89 209138-29 Fax: +49 89 209138-10 mailto:bambach@triplex.de http://www.triplex.de -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Bambach wrote:
Hi,
I want to generate statistics about the access on a zope server like you do on normal web servers (e.g. apache): 1.) What format has the Zope logfile (Z2.log ? Is it the right file ?) ? 2.) Are there any tools like 'webalizer', 'analog' ,... for zope ? 3.) Can I analyze it with such standard tools ? 4.) Are there any parameters I need ?
I run Webalizer and it works just fine. http://www.webalizer.com. Take care, J.P. Racine Thot Networks admin@thot.net
I want to generate statistics about the access on a zope server like you do on normal web servers (e.g. apache): 1.) What format has the Zope logfile (Z2.log ? Is it the right file ?) ?
If you are using straight ZServer the Z2.log is a common log format (CFL). It should have all the information you need.
2.) Are there any tools like 'webalizer', 'analog' ,... for zope ?
Yup. They are called "webalizer" and "analog"..(sorry, could not resist). I am using them both and they both work great. The one thing that does get a little messy is the "pages" since they are looking for ".html" etc. I personally like Analog much better as it can be customized to your hearts content.
3.) Can I analyze it with such standard tools ?
Yup and I am sure the rest would work (Summary, Sawmill, Webtrends, MKStats (if they fix the Y2K bug), Wusage).
4.) Are there any parameters I need ?
Nope. Just run them on Z2.log and enjoy. J
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, J. Atwood wrote:
am using them both and they both work great. The one thing that does get a little messy is the "pages" since they are looking for ".html" etc. I
At least webalizer you can tell to look for *_html etc. for pages. Nils -- "Kif, if there's one thing I don't need it's your 'I don't think that's wise' attitude." --- Zap Brannigan
am using them both and they both work great. The one thing that does get a little messy is the "pages" since they are looking for ".html" etc. I
At least webalizer you can tell to look for *_html etc. for pages.
You can do the same thing in Analog. The problem I have is that I did not name all of my methods .html (for obvious reasons) so pages only apply to the files (documents) I named ".html". J
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, J. Atwood wrote:
am using them both and they both work great. The one thing that does get a little messy is the "pages" since they are looking for ".html" etc. I
At least webalizer you can tell to look for *_html etc. for pages.
You can do the same thing in Analog. The problem I have is that I did not name all of my methods .html (for obvious reasons) so pages only apply to the files (documents) I named ".html".
You can use: PAGEINCLUDE *_html in your Analog config, which will tell Analog to treat all files ending with _html as "pages". You can also have more than one entry, here, so you could say, for example: PAGEINCLUDE *_html,*.html Of course, you then have to name your objects accordingly in Zope; only give the _html extension to objects you view as "pages".
J
--Jeff --- Jeff K. Hoffman 704.849.0731 x108 Chief Technology Officer mailto:jeff@goingv.com Going Virtual, L.L.C. http://www.goingv.com/
participants (5)
-
J. Atwood -
J.P. Racine -
Jeff Hoffman -
Nils Jeppe -
Stefan Bambach