Re: zsyncer 0.5beta error
hello Paul,
I also used the patch at http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope/#bct_sec_5.3 to be able to sync plone folders as well
i need to merge that with the zsyncer sources, i keep forgetting...
BTW: there's a variable missing on the patch for the file ZSyncer.py: filterObjects correct: + def manage_editServer(self, title='', dest=None, log=0, approval=0, override=0, user='', pwd='', logfile='', REQUEST=None, syncable=syncable, filterObjects=0, add_syncable=[]): another remark concerning the rekursive searching mode: set up: - (source) machine 1: folder a, subfolder b, sub-subfolder c - (dest.) machine 2: folder a, subfolder b, (sub-subfolder c missing here) starting zsyncer on folder a: if I select 'recursive comparison mode' and as status filter only 'missing', I don't get the correct answer, even if I got missing SUBFOLDERS on the destination machine. ... since there are no missing folders on level 1, the recursive search stops here. so, it would be better that the script searches first like the users didn't deselect any status filters, get result 1, and applies the filters of the user to result 1. cheers, david.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:22:15AM +0100, David Vogel wrote:
hello Paul,
I also used the patch at http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope/#bct_sec_5.3 to be able to sync plone folders as well
i need to merge that with the zsyncer sources, i keep forgetting...
BTW: there's a variable missing on the patch for the file ZSyncer.py: filterObjects
correct: + def manage_editServer(self, title='', dest=None, log=0, approval=0, override=0, user='', pwd='', logfile='', REQUEST=None, syncable=syncable, filterObjects=0, add_syncable=[]):
I noticed that, thanks :-)
another remark concerning the rekursive searching mode:
set up: - (source) machine 1: folder a, subfolder b, sub-subfolder c - (dest.) machine 2: folder a, subfolder b, (sub-subfolder c missing here)
starting zsyncer on folder a: if I select 'recursive comparison mode' and as status filter only 'missing', I don't get the correct answer, even if I got missing SUBFOLDERS on the destination machine.
The status filter doesn't seem to work at all at the moment.
... since there are no missing folders on level 1, the recursive search stops here. so, it would be better that the script searches first like the users didn't deselect any status filters, get result 1, and applies the filters of the user to result 1.
ah, good idea. Thanks! -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com Look! Up in the sky! It's INCONGRUOUS SUGARY ASPHALTICIAN! (random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
participants (2)
-
David Vogel -
Paul Winkler