You could now recommend W2k as a much more stable *than either 95 or NT4* alternative that does USB support out of the box. -----Original Message----- From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of Capesius, Alan Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:39 PM To: zope@zope.org Subject: [Zope] Re: Some help required but no sarcastic comments this time pleas ee I understand people do use Win9x, but I would always recommend NT 4 workstation over 9x unless there is an overpowering need for USB. I don't use USB myself and have been using NT exclusively on the desktop since 94. When properly configured it is much more stable. Nowadays, NT5 (oops 2000) is a better choice for USB support and about as stable as 9x. But, that aside, I'm interested in your desktop uses for Zope. What sort of apps?

...

From: Toby Dickenson <mbel44@dial.pipex.net> There are those of us who use Zope in desktop applications too (yes really), where Win9x is not an unreasonable choice. Toby Dickenson

_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )