Richard Jones wrote Indeed. Do you use ZPT? If so, join the lets-optimise-ZPT campaign ;-)
Nope, nothing quite so new-fangled as that... large amounts of the dtml have the old dtml syntax too :)
I'd been considering ZPT for some time, but the recent "it's performance sucks" discussions have led me to say "maybe later". We've got enough hassles with screwing performance out of the system as it is right now. (and way, way, way too much to do to spend on tooling up for a major effort on making ZPT work faster). Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
Anthony Baxter wrote:
I'd been considering ZPT for some time, but the recent "it's performance sucks" discussions have led me to say "maybe later". We've got enough hassles with screwing performance out of the system as it is right now. (and way, way, way too much to do to spend on tooling up for a major effort on making ZPT work faster).
Yeah, it's a shame that such as nice templating language has this limitation, but ZC are taking the head-in-sand-lets-use-squid-in-front-of-our-'dynamic'-websites approach :-S cheers, Chris - it's Monday, I'm allowed to be grouchy.
On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 12:28, Anthony Baxter wrote:
Richard Jones wrote Indeed. Do you use ZPT? If so, join the lets-optimise-ZPT campaign ;-)
Nope, nothing quite so new-fangled as that... large amounts of the dtml have the old dtml syntax too :)
I'd been considering ZPT for some time, but the recent "it's performance sucks" discussions have led me to say "maybe later".
In my quick test ZPTs performance seemed to suck on par with DTML :( _______________________________________________
participants (3)
-
Anthony Baxter -
Chris Withers -
Hannu Krosing