ZODBC configuration problems
Are you running 2.2? Look at: http://www.egroups.com/message/zope/36392 Is the Access DB on the same server as Zope? If not, you may be running into problems accessing the network. The Zope service may need to be switched to run under a user account that has access to the network resource. The NT System account does not have network authority. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/periodic/period98/ewn9824.htm http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q235/5/36.ASP Is the ODBC DSN a system DSN? Don't use User DSN. Alan Capesius, MCSE+21 Sysmex Corp of America
Message: 17 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:59:32 -0600 From: paul_s_johnson@urscorp.com Subject: ZODBC configuration problems
The permissions on this database are such that any anonymous user can access its data so the error message appears to be inaccurate. I double checked the db permissions to make sure this is the case.
I am running Zope on NT 4.0 and using Access 97. The logged-in user on the webserver is not a member of any Access-related workgroups so this eliminates most security-related access issues (I think) and none of the databases are passworded.
There's some flakiness going on here. Any recommendations for isolating and resolving these problems?
Thanks,
P. Johnson
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 18 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:41:50 -0500 From: "Chris McDonough" <chrism@digicool.com> Subject: Re: Factoids for supporting zope
Our client thought that the recent VC money was about 1/2 what would be needed to make it fly. My argument is that money is leveraged by the active Zope community so a crux in my logic is how strong this community is.
1/2 of what would be needed to make it fly with Zope? Or 1/2 of what would be needed with any app server?
Since they come from a non Zope context it would be from the general position and the onus is on me to bring in the Zope context in the construction of my argument.
Ah. Well, my opinion is that it'd be fairly dangerous to make the assertion that (as great as they both are) Zope and the Zope community can "make up for" the other half of the capital they need to develop the software they want. So what's the decision they're trying to make? Whether to develop at all?
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 19 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:28:11 +0100 From: "Max M" <maxmcorp@worldonline.dk> Subject: RE: How do i write <or>?
From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of Stoonsdesign
The thing is that I have this page (made by somebody else) wich is supposed to look up some words in a database by writing:
Hi Stoons
It really is impossible to answer that question without knowing how that page works.
But maybe letter=* will work.
Regards Max M
Max M. W. Rasmussen, Denmark. New Media Director private: maxmcorp@worldonline.dk work: maxm@normik.dk ----------------------------------------------------- Specialization is for insects. - Robert A. Heinlein
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 20 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:34:59 -0400 From: "Dany Rioux" <rdany@drioux.com> Subject: RE: Possible disaster upgrading to 2.2.4
I was thinking about downloading the ZDiscussions product and install it but from what I can see, it looks like it needs some fixing.
I intend to upgrade to zope 2.2.4 when it was proven that it is stable but I don't want to run into more troubles that I can chew on.
I will need a Discussion board when the site go live so should I upgrade Zope and wait for another Discussion Product to come up or install ZDiscussion and hold on the Zope upgrade?
TIA
Dany
-----Original Message----- From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of Bill Welch Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:50 AM To: zope@zope.org Cc: Jonathan Cheyne Subject: Re: [Zope] Possible disaster upgrading to 2.2.4
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Jonathan Cheyne wrote:
Ah, I tried reinstalling zddiscussions, no joy, i tried deleting zdiscussions but when you restart zeop it reinstalls the two products as broken.
You have to delete it from lib/python/Products as well, but it's a red herring for the real issue (see below).
i tried a new install of 2.2.4 then copy across my data.fs bits and untar various products in use on the site, but, exactly the same message. so it may not be th eupgrade but something in 2.2.4 itself that my data.fs dislikes.
No, it's your data.fs that's the problem. It's been corrupted the same way several others have been the past few months (ZDiscussions is suspiciously overrepresented as the pickled data in the traceback). See the 'Is data.fs corrupted' thread.
Bill.
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 21 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:40:04 +0000 From: Robin Becker <robin@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] CVS down?
In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011280858460.2824-100000@serenade.digicool.co m>, Ken Manheimer <klm@digicool.com> writes
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Robin Becker wrote:
C:\Python\devel\Zope>cvs -z9 upd -A -P -d CVS.EXE [update aborted]: connect to zope.org:2401 failed: Connection refused
Am I pointing at the wrong server or something?
OK that works for me. I had to use cvs_chroot.py, but that seemed to go OK. -- Robin Becker
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 22 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:29:51 -0500 From: "Brian Lloyd" <brian@digicool.com> Subject: RE: 2.2.4 upgrade query
Further to my paniced posting earlier, I reinstalled 2.2.0, copied over my data.fs* and various products and everything fired up fine but i did one experiment (following on from Chris) - i didnt install zdiscussions. This resulted in major oids errors and my broken zclass as before/ install zdiscussions and bingo i am back in business. so. two questios:
1. why does my zclass appear to require zdiscussions when it is not based on it?
Not sure on that...
2. does 2.2.4 contain some parts of what was previously
the standalone
zdiscussions product?
No. The only thing I could think of is maybe some change in the way products are registered or something that affects ZDiscussions badly. I'm just guessing here. Have you tried going from 2.2.0 -> 2.2.1 or 2.2.2? If you see the same thing on one of them, that would narrow it down and we could look at the diffs between those releases and see if anything looks suspicious...
Brian Lloyd brian@digicool.com Software Engineer 540.371.6909 Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 23 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:44:16 -0500 From: "Chris McDonough" <chrism@digicool.com> Subject: Re: Possible disaster upgrading to 2.2.4
Yes, there definitely seems to be something funky with ZDiscussions. It's been at the heart of several threads which claim "ZODB corruption". If someone had the time to figure it out, I think we'd all feel better. ;-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Welch" <bill@carbonecho.com> To: <zope@zope.org> Cc: "Jonathan Cheyne" <jonathan@home-all.org.uk> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:50 AM Subject: Re: [Zope] Possible disaster upgrading to 2.2.4
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Jonathan Cheyne wrote:
Ah, I tried reinstalling zddiscussions, no joy, i tried deleting zdiscussions but when you restart zeop it reinstalls the two products as broken.
You have to delete it from lib/python/Products as well, but it's a red herring for the real issue (see below).
i tried a new install of 2.2.4 then copy across my data.fs bits and untar various products in use on the site, but, exactly the same message. so it may not be th eupgrade but something in 2.2.4 itself that my data.fs dislikes.
No, it's your data.fs that's the problem. It's been corrupted the same way several others have been the past few months (ZDiscussions is suspiciously overrepresented as the pickled data in the traceback). See the 'Is data.fs corrupted' thread.
Bill.
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 24 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:34:11 -0500 (EST) From: albert boulanger <aboulang@ldeo.columbia.edu> Subject: Re: Factoids for supporting zope
From: "Chris McDonough" <chrism@digicool.com> Cc: <zope@zope.org> References: <200011281450.JAA01114@ox.ldgo.columbia.edu> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:41:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Length: 851
Our client thought that the recent VC money was about 1/2 what would be needed to make it fly. My argument is that money is leveraged by the active Zope community so a crux in my logic is how strong this community is.
1/2 of what would be needed to make it fly with Zope? Or 1/2 of what would be needed with any app server?
Since they come from a non Zope context it would be from the general position and the onus is on me to bring in the Zope context in the construction of my argument.
Ah. Well, my opinion is that it'd be fairly dangerous to make the assertion that (as great as they both are) Zope and the Zope community can "make up for" the other half of the capital they need to develop the software they want. So what's the decision they're trying to make? Whether to develop at all?
Whether to go with portal products from Plumtree or iPlanet.
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
Message: 25 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:54 -0800 From: rlanham@speakeasy.net Subject: Re: html expertise anyone.
dtml as a server side scripting language is not going to change anything dynamically on your page. Maybe you mean DHTML.
In IE everything is in the DOM and can be changed. Netscape is not thorough, and I don't think there is a hook that will change a.visited, et al.
But you could try.
IE has a links collection, like .images and .all
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_____________________________________________________________ ___________ _____________________________________________________________ ___________
participants (1)
-
Capesius, Alan