Are ZC still recommending compiling python without the garbage collector / pymalloc? seb
seb bacon wrote:
Are ZC still recommending compiling python without the garbage collector / pymalloc?
seb
I'm not ZC at all, but if you're using PythonScripts without GC, you're going to find yourself bleeding memory everywhere - the python Compiler package is cycloriffic. Anthony
At 06.02.2002 10:58 +0000, seb bacon wrote:
Are ZC still recommending compiling python without the garbage collector / pymalloc?
seb
pymalloc is bad because of ExtensionClass incompatibility. cycle-gc is good if you have Python 2.1.2 + Zope 2.4.4/2.5.0. Otherwise it will increase your chances of triggering the stack-trashing bugs. I am also successfully running Python 2.0.1 + Zope 2.3.3 with cycle-gc enabled. But I am not ZC ;-) Stefan
With GC enabled, but without pymalloc enabled. ----- Original Message ----- From: "seb bacon" <seb@jamkit.com> To: <zope@zope.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:58 AM Subject: [Zope] pymalloc, stacks, garbage
Are ZC still recommending compiling python without the garbage collector / pymalloc?
seb
participants (4)
-
anthony baxter -
Matthew T. Kromer -
seb bacon -
Stefan H. Holek