Zope Benchmarks Published
Upon the request of the DC guys I have published my benchmark results on Zope and Tomcat. http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/benchmarks.html Any feedback would be great. Thanks, J
Hello, This is a great start. Any chance of adding Squid into the mix? ala Itamar Shtull-Trauring's post. It could be interesting. Jimmie Houchin "J. Atwood" wrote:
Upon the request of the DC guys I have published my benchmark results on Zope and Tomcat.
http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/benchmarks.html
Any feedback would be great.
Thanks, J
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
At 08:05 AM 5/2/2000 -0400, J. Atwood wrote:
Upon the request of the DC guys I have published my benchmark results on Zope and Tomcat.
http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/benchmarks.html
Any feedback would be great.
Interesting and impressive. But what JVM are you using? That could make a big difference. ---- Matt Gushee 303.766.1336 x124 Consultant Fax: 303.699.8331 Architag International Cell: 303.941.0759 mgushee@architag.com http://architag.com
On Tue, 2 May 2000, J. Atwood wrote:
Upon the request of the DC guys I have published my benchmark results on Zope and Tomcat.
http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/benchmarks.html
Any feedback would be great.
As long as you are benchmarking things, try applying my C module replacement for medusa.asyncore.poll(): http://dustman.net/andy/python/asyncore Some anecodotal evidence: This code was installed on a site running Apache + FastCGI + Squishdot, which was very heavily loaded, and giving up a lot of broken pipe errors (probably due to FastCGI). The load that the site was able to handle (simultaneous connections) increased by 30-60%. There were still broken pipe problems, but subsequent upgrades to Apache and the FastCGI module got rid of all or most of them. Since it was not a controlled test, I wouldn't consider this a benchmark. But since you seem to be set up for doing them... :) -- andy dustman | programmer/analyst | comstar.net, inc. telephone: 770.485.6025 / 706.549.7689 | icq: 32922760 | pgp: 0xc72f3f1d "Therefore, sweet knights, if you may doubt your strength or courage, come no further, for death awaits you all, with nasty, big, pointy teeth!"
How about Zope vs PHP or Zope vs Enhydra? These seem pretty relevant, and I know alot of people I talk to about Zope are current PHP users. Zope vs Zend would be good too. Jiva On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 05:28:08PM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2000, J. Atwood wrote:
Upon the request of the DC guys I have published my benchmark results on Zope and Tomcat.
http://www.zope.org/Members/BwanaZulia/benchmarks.html
Any feedback would be great.
As long as you are benchmarking things, try applying my C module replacement for medusa.asyncore.poll():
http://dustman.net/andy/python/asyncore
Some anecodotal evidence: This code was installed on a site running Apache + FastCGI + Squishdot, which was very heavily loaded, and giving up a lot of broken pipe errors (probably due to FastCGI). The load that the site was able to handle (simultaneous connections) increased by 30-60%. There were still broken pipe problems, but subsequent upgrades to Apache and the FastCGI module got rid of all or most of them. Since it was not a controlled test, I wouldn't consider this a benchmark. But since you seem to be set up for doing them... :)
-- ... I see TOILET SEATS ...
participants (5)
-
Andy Dustman -
J. Atwood -
Jimmie Houchin -
jiva@devware.com -
Matt Gushee