In my experience, "can be correct" == "human intervention required", not what one wants to be doing. A lot of bandwidth wasted right here for a "can be correct"... (WRT someone else's comments) I like the new Zope site, it's eye candy, I agree, but how else does one tempt the kiddie-surfers? :) I find it more functional in some respects. And main goal - also show capabilities of Zope - is definitely served better with the new site. Regards. -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Joly [mailto:gordon.joly@pobox.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:04 To: Andy McKay Cc: Gordon Joly; zope@zope.org; Gordon Joly Subject: Re: [Zope] md5 sums At 23:56 -0700 2003/08/18, Andy McKay wrote:

No thats what I get. But my point was that I think all md5sums on zope.org are incorrect. You'll notice all md5 sums on all files on zope seem to start with a 0.

[andy@basil tmp]$ md5sum Zope-2.6.1-linux2-x86.tgz cd2ca5eb1c9c014844895b93339c0291 Zope-2.6.1-linux2-x86.tgz

OK.... I see what you are saying. But we read..... **** MD5 Sums are 32 byte character strings that are the result of running the MD5 sum program against a particular file. Since any difference between two files results in two different strings, MD5's can be used to determine that the file or iso you downloaded is a bit-for-bit copy of the remote file or iso. **** So we both get the same md5sum for the image.... cd2ca5eb1c9c014844895b93339c0291 But the published string is.. 0cd2ca5eb1c9c14844895b93339c291 which has 31 characters (30 without the leaded zero). So........ can this be corrected? Gordo. -- Linux User No. 256022/// http://pobox.com/~gordo/ gordon.joly@pobox.com/// _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )